Related Articles for PubMed (Select 18373863)

Effective x-ray attenuation coefficient measurements from two full field digital mammography systems for data calibration applications.

Heine JJ, Thomas JA.

Biomed Eng Online. 2008 Mar 28;7:13.

PMID: 18373863 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Related Articles Free article in PMC

Effective x-ray attenuation measurements with full field digital mammography.

Heine JJ, Behera M.

Med Phys. 2006 Nov;33(11):4350-66.

PMID: 17153414 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Error analysis of calibration materials on dual-energy mammography.

Mou X, Chen X.

Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2007;10(Pt 2):596-603.

PMID: 18044617 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.

Marshall NW.

Phys Med Biol. 2007 Sep 21;52(18):5545-68. Epub 2007 Sep 3.

PMID: 17804881 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.

Kaufhold J, Thomas JA, Eberhard JW, Galbo CE, Trotter DE.

Med Phys. 2002 Aug;29(8):1867-80.

PMID: 12201434 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Dual-energy digital mammography: calibration and inverse-mapping techniques to estimate calcification thickness and glandular-tissue ratio.

Kappadath SC, Shaw CC.

Med Phys. 2003 Jun;30(6):1110-7.

PMID: 12852535 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Quantification of breast arterial calcification using full field digital mammography.

Molloi S, Xu T, Ducote J, Iribarren C.

Med Phys. 2008 Apr;35(4):1428-39.

PMID: 18491538 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.

Kuzmiak CM, Pisano ED, Cole EB, Zeng D, Burns CB, Roberto C, Pavic D, Lee Y, Seo BK, Koomen M, Washburn D.

Med Phys. 2005 Oct;32(10):3144-50.

PMID: 16279068 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.

Gong X, Glick SJ, Liu B, Vedula AA, Thacker S.

Med Phys. 2006 Apr;33(4):1041-52.

PMID: 16696481 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

10:

On the noise variance of a digital mammography system.

Burgess A.

Med Phys. 2004 Jul;31(7):1987-95.

PMID: 15305451 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

11:

Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit.

Lu LJ, Nishino TK, Khamapirad T, Grady JJ, Leonard MH Jr, Brunder DG.

Phys Med Biol. 2007 Aug 21;52(16):4905-21. Epub 2007 Jul 30.

PMID: 17671343 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

12:

Toward objective and quantitative evaluation of imaging systems using images of phantoms.

Gagne RM, Gallas BD, Myers KJ.

Med Phys. 2006 Jan;33(1):83-95.

PMID: 16485413 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

13:

Mass density images from the diffraction enhanced imaging technique.

Hasnah MO, Parham C, Pisano ED, Zhong Z, Oltulu O, Chapman D.

Med Phys. 2005 Feb;32(2):549-52.

PMID: 15789601 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

14:

Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose.

Berns EA, Hendrick RE, Cutter GR.

Med Phys. 2003 Mar;30(3):334-40.

PMID: 12674233 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

15:

A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.

Marshall NW.

Phys Med Biol. 2006 May 21;51(10):2441-63. Epub 2006 Apr 26.

PMID: 16675862 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

16:

Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.

Carton AK, Bosmans H, Vandenbroucke D, Souverijns G, Van Ongeval C, Dragusin O, Marchal G.

Med Phys. 2004 Jul;31(7):2165-76.

PMID: 15305471 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

17:

An iterative three-dimensional electron density imaging algorithm using uncollimated compton scattered x rays from a polyenergetic primary pencil beam.

Van Uytven E, Pistorius S, Gordon R.

Med Phys. 2007 Jan;34(1):256-65.

PMID: 17278511 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

18:

Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections.

Kappadath SC, Shaw CC.

Med Phys. 2005 Nov;32(11):3395-408.

PMID: 16372415 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

19:

A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms.

Pawluczyk O, Augustine BJ, Yaffe MJ, Rico D, Yang J, Mawdsley GE, Boyd NF.

Med Phys. 2003 Mar;30(3):352-64.

PMID: 12674236 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

20:

Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview.

Bosmans H, Carton AK, Rogge F, Zanca F, Jacobs J, Van Ongeval C, Nijs K, Van Steen A, Marchal G.

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1-3):120-30. Epub 2006 Feb 3.

PMID: 16461531 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Recent Activity