Effective x-ray attenuation coefficient measurements from two full field digital mammography systems for data calibration applications

John J Heine¹ and Jerry A Thomas²

¹Cancer Prevention & Control Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA

²Department of Radiology, Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita Kansas, USA

author email corresponding author email

BioMedical Engineering OnLine 2008, 7:13doi:10.1186/1475-925X-7-13


Published:	28 March 2008

Abstract

Background

Breast density is a significant breast cancer risk factor. Currently, there is no standard method for measuring this important factor. Work presented here represents an essential component of an ongoing project that seeks to determine the appropriate method for calibrating (standardizing) mammography image data to account for the x-ray image acquisition influences. Longer term goals of this project are to make accurate breast density measurements in support of risk studies.

Methods

Logarithmic response calibration curves and effective x-ray attenuation coefficients were measured from two full field digital mammography (FFDM) systems with breast tissue equivalent phantom imaging and compared. Normalization methods were studied to assess the possibility of reducing the amount of calibration data collection. The percent glandular calibration map functional form was investigated. Spatial variations in the calibration data were used to assess the uncertainty in the calibration application by applying error propagation analyses.

Results

Logarithmic response curves are well approximated as linear. Measured effective x-ray attenuation coefficients are characteristic quantities independent of the imaging system and are in agreement with those predicted numerically. Calibration data collection can be reduced by applying a simple normalization technique. The calibration map is well approximated as linear. Intrasystem calibration variation was on the order of four percent, which was approximately half of the intersystem variation.

Conclusion

FFDM systems provide a quantitative output, and the calibration quantities presented here may be used for data acquired on similar FFDM systems.